gossip lanka

Fitch Ratings: Sri Lanka Election Result Increases Policy Uncertainty

Sri Lanka's presidential election significantly increases policy uncertainty and could prompt loosening that exacerbates fiscal weaknesses and a rollback of reforms, Fitch Ratings says. However, whether these risks materialise remains to be seen as a clear policy direction may only start to emerge after parliamentary elections.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) defeated Sajith Premadasa of the ruling United National Party (UNP) in Saturday's election. He is a former defence secretary and the brother of SLPP leader and ex-president Mahinda Rajapaksa. Mahinda Rajapaksa has been named prime minister following the resignation of the UNP's Ranil Wickremesinghe, and an interim cabinet is likely to be appointed.

The policy environment in Sri Lanka (B/Stable) had improved following the resolution of the 2018 political crisis, supporting the resumption of fiscal and economic reforms and of Sri Lanka's IMF programme. However, political tensions could resurface ahead of elections to parliament, where the UNP is the largest party. These are expected early next year. The new president's constitutional reform plans could resurrect controversial proposals to enhance the executive's powers.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa's economic manifesto targets average growth of 6.5% or higher, compared with 3.2% in 2018 and a Fitch-forecast 2.8% in 2019, by promoting commodity and apparel exports, construction and tourism. Strengthening growth and exports would be credit positive, but we think there is a risk of a more expansionary fiscal stance after the parliamentary elections.

Under Mahinda Rajapaska's presidency from 2005-2015, an aggressive infrastructure drive pushed up government debt. Gotabaya Rajapaksa's manifesto targets a budget deficit below 4% of GDP and inflation below 5%. Although detailed economic plans are yet to be announced, we think achieving ambitious growth targets could entail stimulus measures that erode fiscal headroom, which is limited by high public debt (about 83% of GDP). This could undermine policy credibility, investor confidence, and potentially complicate relations with the IMF.